https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-25 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, | |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- using V [[gnu::vector_size(16)]] = short; V f(V s) { return V{ short(1) >> s[0], short(1) >> s[1], short(1) >> s[2], short(1) >> s[3], short(1) >> s[4], short(1) >> s[5], short(1) >> s[6], short(1) >> s[7] }; } the frontend gives us return <retval> = {(short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[0]), (short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[1]), (short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[2]), (short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[3]), (short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[4]), (short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[5]), (short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[6]), (short int) (1 >> (int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<short int[8]>(s)[7])}; and the promotion/demotion stays until eventually basic-block vectorization vectorizes this without doing the promotion. t.ii:14:5: note: vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected: _3 = 1 >> _2; t.ii:14:5: note: demoting int to signed short t.ii:14:5: note: created pattern stmt: patt_36 = 1 >> _1; I don't think there's any way to query the target about whether vector shifts "behave". We end up with V f (V s) { vector(8) signed short vect_patt_36.3; <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]: vect_patt_36.3_62 = { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 } >> s_33(D); return vect_patt_36.3_62;