https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2023-06-02
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note that when you do it as
> proposed the code will appear as having no coverage (the counters will be
> allocated at the host side but nothing will increment them).
ACK, our customer does understand this.
I infer correctly that the "do it as proposed" does seem fine to you:
(In reply to me from comment #0)
> My idea is to abstract the "increment the edge execution count" operations
> into some new GIMPLE/IFN code (?), and then later, once the offloading code
> has been split off, lower it to the current form (host-side), or no-op
> (device-side). I'd appreciate a quick review if that approach makes sense?
