https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #11)
> > Then the compiler (and the standard) is not what they consider. Such
> > misunderstandings are everywhere and this has no difference.
>
> Where is int128 in "the standard"?
Consider this:
const _Atomic long double x = 0.1;
int main()
{
double y = x;
return y != 0.1;
}
If CAS is used here, the program will just segfault. Does the standard say
this is ill-formed or not?
