https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #19) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > Just to add one note, which is that Apple's gcc-4.2.1 implementation for > > blocks was not actually submitted (and therefore doesn't exist on an FSF > > server); it's my understanding that means we cannot use / forward port it. > > > > I'm working on a new version - based on trying to match what clang's current > > code-gen produces. > > Is this implementation of some use for us? > https://code.google.com/archive/p/plblocks/ Not for the compiler - the runtime might be useful for 10.5. I recently brought my patches forward from GCC-5 => GCC-10 (easier to avoid the .c => .cc file renaming). Since we now face some problems with sanitiser support without blocks, this is moved up the TODO.
