https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110827
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I'm seeing all code properly instrumented. The coverage I see is
<snip>
> 1: 27:task foo() {
> -: 28: std::cout << "Running..." << std::endl;
> -: 29: co_return;
> 2: 30:}
<snip>
>
> I have no idea why for example line 28 isn't marked executed.
So we are recognising that the ramp function has run:
foo () {
.... compiler-generated code with no line numbers
}
but execution of the the outlined body (which is the 'actor' function) is not,
apparently recorded.
The actor is essentially:
foo.actor()
.. compiler-generated code no line numbers
{
std::cout << "Running..." << std::endl;
co_return;
}
.. compiler-generated code no line numbers
co_return expands to some compiler-generated code too - so it's possible the
line numbers get confusing there - but the cout line ought to be
uncontroversial.
