https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100805
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=84764
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For C2x and C++23 __int128 can be an extended integer type, so we don't need to
pretend it doesn't exist.
