https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Neumann <tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net> --- The assert itself is old, it was just updated due to code changes. And asserting there makes sense, if we keep an old frame around we might see a crash later during unwinding if the unwinder tries to access code that does no longer exist due to dlclose. This does not apply if the bug is in the program itself, of course, but I think it is more probable that it is a bug in gcc. If somebody has a VM image or a remote machine I can use I would be happy to debug the problem myself, but I do not have access to Solaris.
