https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111228
Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2023-08-30
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. The testsuite log shows for vsx-extract-6.c and vsx-extract-7.c:
gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-extract-6.c: \\mxxpermdi\\M found 2 times
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-extract-6.c scan-assembler-times \\mxxpermdi\\M 1
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-extract-6.c scan-assembler-not \\mvspltisw\\M
So we have an extra xxpermdi than we expected and we also have a vspltisw when
we expected none. I haven't looked at whether the code is better or worse
though, to know whether we should just update the expected counts or whether
this is really a code quality regression.
