https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Does
2023-10-12  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR bootstrap/111787
        * tree.h (wi::int_traits <unextended_tree>::needs_write_val_arg): New
        static data member.
        (int_traits <extended_tree <N>>::needs_write_val_arg): Likewise.
        (wi::ints_for): Provide separate partial specializations for
        generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N>> and INL_CONST_PRECISION or that
        and CONST_PRECISION, rather than using
        int_traits <extended_tree <N> >::precision_type as the second template
        argument.
        * rtl.h (wi::int_traits <rtx_mode_t>::needs_write_val_arg): New
        static data member.
        * double-int.h (wi::int_traits <double_int>::needs_write_val_arg):
        Likewise.

--- gcc/tree.h.jj       2023-10-12 16:01:04.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/tree.h  2023-10-12 16:52:51.977954615 +0200
@@ -6237,6 +6237,7 @@ namespace wi
     static const enum precision_type precision_type = VAR_PRECISION;
     static const bool host_dependent_precision = false;
     static const bool is_sign_extended = false;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
   };

   template <int N>
@@ -6262,6 +6263,7 @@ namespace wi
       = N == ADDR_MAX_PRECISION ? INL_CONST_PRECISION : CONST_PRECISION;
     static const bool host_dependent_precision = false;
     static const bool is_sign_extended = true;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
     static const unsigned int precision = N;
   };

@@ -6293,8 +6295,14 @@ namespace wi
   tree_to_poly_wide_ref to_poly_wide (const_tree);

   template <int N>
-  struct ints_for <generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> >,
-                  int_traits <extended_tree <N> >::precision_type>
+  struct ints_for <generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> >, INL_CONST_PRECISION>
+  {
+    typedef generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> > extended;
+    static extended zero (const extended &);
+  };
+
+  template <int N>
+  struct ints_for <generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> >, CONST_PRECISION>
   {
     typedef generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> > extended;
     static extended zero (const extended &);
@@ -6532,8 +6540,15 @@ wi::to_poly_wide (const_tree t)
 template <int N>
 inline generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >
 wi::ints_for <generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >,
-             wi::int_traits <wi::extended_tree <N> >::precision_type
-            >::zero (const extended &x)
+             wi::INL_CONST_PRECISION>::zero (const extended &x)
+{
+  return build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (x.get_tree ()));
+}
+
+template <int N>
+inline generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >
+wi::ints_for <generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >,
+             wi::CONST_PRECISION>::zero (const extended &x)
 {
   return build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (x.get_tree ()));
 }
--- gcc/rtl.h.jj        2023-09-29 22:04:44.463012421 +0200
+++ gcc/rtl.h   2023-10-12 16:54:59.915240074 +0200
@@ -2270,6 +2270,7 @@ namespace wi
     /* This ought to be true, except for the special case that BImode
        is canonicalized to STORE_FLAG_VALUE, which might be 1.  */
     static const bool is_sign_extended = false;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
     static unsigned int get_precision (const rtx_mode_t &);
     static wi::storage_ref decompose (HOST_WIDE_INT *, unsigned int,
                                      const rtx_mode_t &);
--- gcc/double-int.h.jj 2023-10-12 16:01:04.260164202 +0200
+++ gcc/double-int.h    2023-10-12 16:53:41.401292272 +0200
@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ namespace wi
   {
     static const enum precision_type precision_type = INL_CONST_PRECISION;
     static const bool host_dependent_precision = true;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
     static const unsigned int precision = HOST_BITS_PER_DOUBLE_INT;
     static unsigned int get_precision (const double_int &);
     static wi::storage_ref decompose (HOST_WIDE_INT *, unsigned int,
fix this?
It works for me in stage3 gcc subdir, but that worked fine without it too (I've
been using g++ 12 as stage1 compiler).

Reply via email to