https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #20 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19) > So maybe it's the same issue as PR90348 (you can verify the RTL expansion > dump on whether the two involved decls are coalesced and see whether that's > valid). Thanks for the hints! Unfortunately the internal BE machine which I worked on for this is unreachable today, will post more findings when it comes back.
