https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111923
--- Comment #4 from Stas Sergeev <stsp at users dot sourceforge.net> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > One more note, default argument clause does not apply here as the it is not > an argument of a method of that class but rather a different context (the > lamdba definition context). Yes, but doesn't this apply to the note4? [Note 4: A complete-class context of a nested class is also a complete-class context of any enclosing class, if the nested class is defined within the member-specification of the enclosing class. — end note] Isn't lambda an instance of a nested class here? > int off_p = offsetof(A, a); > is well formed due to it being a DMI. Thanks for info. Do you happen to know the particular reason why the standard disallows this for static member? Shouldn't that be a DR?
