https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111645
--- Comment #6 from Steven Munroe <munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #5)
> There are a couple of issues with the test case in the attachment. For
> example one of the tests is:
>
>
> static inline vui64_t
> vec_vsldbi_64 (vui64_t vra, vui64_t vrb, const unsigned int shb)
> {
> return vec_sldb (vra, vrb, shb);
> }
>
> When I tried to compile it, it seemed to compile. However if I take off the
> static inline, then I get an error about in compatible arguments. The
> built-in requires an explicit integer be based in the third argument. The
> following worked for me:
>
>
> static inline vui64_t
> vec_vsldbi_64 (vui64_t vra, vui64_t vrb, const unsigned int shb)
> {
> return vec_sldb (vra, vrb, 1);
> }
>
> The compiler/assembler needs an explicit value for the third argument as it
> has to generate the instruction with the immediate shift value as part of
> the instruction. Hence a variable for the third argument will not work.
>
> Agreed that the __int128 arguments can and should be supported. Patch to
> add that support is in progress but will require getting the LLVM/OpenXL
> team to agree to adding the __128int variants as well.
Yes I know. in the PVECLIB case these functions will always be static inline.
So this is not issue for me.
