https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801

--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I think wrong-code should be high-priority ;)

Oh. I see. Sorry. I thought it was the previous RVV shift ISA issue.
since I saw c(g[1] >> 32);

Confirm it is wrong code. Will take a look at it.

Thanks for remind.

Reply via email to