https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112801
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > I think wrong-code should be high-priority ;) Oh. I see. Sorry. I thought it was the previous RVV shift ISA issue. since I saw c(g[1] >> 32); Confirm it is wrong code. Will take a look at it. Thanks for remind.