https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #1) > int k[3]; It would better if we didn't depend on an uninitialized variable (I have a patch against reassoc to not handle uninitialized/undef names) and initializing k as: ``` int k[3]={0,0,0}; ``` Still shows the issue ...