https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113476
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, so it's we have
class ipcp_vr_lattice
{
public:
Value_Range m_vr;
inline bool bottom_p () const;
inline bool top_p () const;
inline bool set_to_bottom ();
bool meet_with (const vrange &p_vr);
bool meet_with (const ipcp_vr_lattice &other);
void init (tree type);
void print (FILE * f);
private:
bool meet_with_1 (const vrange &other_vr);
};
so no explicit DTOR and if we destroy the object then Value_Range doesn't
have a CTOR. I also don't see we destroy ipcp_param_lattices? Of course
irange doesn't have a DTOR in the first place ...
Martin? Andrew?
