https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Just to put it somewhere I ran dwlocstat on cc1plus before/after the offending change and it looks almost the same. We go from cov% samples cumul 0..10 1280217/38% 1280217/38% 11..20 55668/1% 1335885/40% 21..30 68004/2% 1403889/42% 31..40 70774/2% 1474663/44% 41..50 75554/2% 1550217/46% 51..60 91816/2% 1642033/49% 61..70 101139/3% 1743172/52% 71..80 135281/4% 1878453/56% 81..90 198470/5% 2076923/62% 91..100 1233822/37% 3310745/100% to cov% samples cumul 0..10 1280197/38% 1280197/38% 11..20 55669/1% 1335866/40% 21..30 68014/2% 1403880/42% 31..40 70773/2% 1474653/44% 41..50 75542/2% 1550195/46% 51..60 91800/2% 1641995/49% 61..70 101133/3% 1743128/52% 71..80 135259/4% 1878387/56% 81..90 198496/5% 2076883/62% 91..100 1233844/37% 3310727/100%
