https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113772
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> --- Isn't __atomic_is_lock_free tied to the __GCC_ATOMIC_XXX_T_LOCK_FREE macros?
[Bug d/113772] [14 Regression] atomic.d compile error since recent upstream imports.
ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs Mon, 05 Feb 2024 09:39:05 -0800
- [Bug d/113772] New: [14 Regress... iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug d/113772] [14 Regress... ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org via Gcc-bugs
