https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113838
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |x86_64 Component|tree-optimization |target Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The difference from the gimple level IR: ``` _14 = g_26[5][3][0]; _15 = (int) _14; _16 = _13 ^ _15; g_51 = _16; if (_13 != _15) ``` vs: ``` _14 = g_26[5][3][0]; _15 = (int) _14; _16 = _13 ^ _15; g_51 = _16; if (_16 != 0) goto <bb 4>; [50.00%] else goto <bb 3>; [50.00%] ``` This is expected behavior even for the x86_64 target