https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114116
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > Created attachment 57545 [details] > > gcc14-pr114116.patch > > > > This seems to fix it, so far tested just on the small testcase, back to the > > expected backtrace there. > > Should we check -g? Without -g, I don't think we need to save FP. NO, the code generated with -g should be the same as without ...
