https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114339
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab2da8fb67b1aa0557a16b62689a888730dba610 commit r14-9494-gab2da8fb67b1aa0557a16b62689a888730dba610 Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Fri Mar 15 10:46:47 2024 +0100 i386: Fix a pasto in ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp [PR114339] In r13-3803-gfa271afb58 I've added an optimization for LE/LEU/GE/GEU comparison against CONST_VECTOR. As the comments say: /* x <= cst can be handled as x < cst + 1 unless there is wrap around in cst + 1. */ ... /* For LE punt if some element is signed maximum. */ ... /* For LEU punt if some element is unsigned maximum. */ and /* x >= cst can be handled as x > cst - 1 unless there is wrap around in cst - 1. */ ... /* For GE punt if some element is signed minimum. */ ... /* For GEU punt if some element is zero. */ Apparently I wrote the GE/GEU (second case) first and then copied/adjusted it for LE/LEU, most of the adjustments look correct, but I've left if (code == GE) comparison when testing if it should punt for signed maximum. That condition is never true, because this is in switch (code) { ... case LE: case LEU: block and we really meant to be what the comment says, for LE punt if some element is signed maximum, as then cst + 1 wraps around. The following patch fixes the pasto. 2024-03-15 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR target/114339 * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp) <case LE>: Fix a pasto, compare code against LE rather than GE. * gcc.target/i386/pr114339.c: New test.
