https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114488

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On the gcc-9 branch the first bad commit is r9-8623-g0296697cf9893d

commit 0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:   Mon May 25 18:38:09 2020 -0400

    c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212]

    This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1
    rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression.  As in that case, when we're
    trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a
    constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to
the
    captured variable.

            PR c++/90212
            * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda
            function, consider a captured variable directly.

Reply via email to