https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114477
--- Comment #6 from 康桓瑋 <hewillk at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jiang An from comment #5) > (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > > Since P3059R0 is closed (although I feel bad about this) > > BTW, now I think this is somehow unfortunate. > P3059 behaved like a follow-up paper of P2711 IMO. Both papers effectively > suggested that "some design choices of C++23 views are better, let's apply > them to C++20 views". You are absolutely right. Is there any way to reopen it? I recall that it was just because the committee didn't want to spend time on it.
