https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114590

--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <h...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06a7e7514af67d9f3c51fe7a592b5166da791e2f

commit r14-9820-g06a7e7514af67d9f3c51fe7a592b5166da791e2f
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 5 08:56:15 2024 -0700

    x86: Use explicit shift count in double-precision shifts

    Don't use implicit shift count in double-precision shifts in AT&T syntax
    since they aren't in Intel SDM.  Keep the 's' modifier for backward
    compatibility with inline asm statements.

            PR target/114590
            * config/i386/i386.md (x86_64_shld): Use explicit shift count in
            AT&T syntax.
            (x86_64_shld_ndd): Likewise.
            (x86_shld): Likewise.
            (x86_shld_ndd): Likewise.
            (x86_64_shrd): Likewise.
            (x86_64_shrd_ndd): Likewise.
            (x86_shrd): Likewise.
            (x86_shrd_ndd): Likewise.

Reply via email to