https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114646
--- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > What was done for libstdc++ was only specific to libstdc++ even though it > uses the same headers, it was not changed for the generic libgcc code which > is used in other places including but not limited to the unwinder, and > libobjc. now the question comes to do we want to bring in pthread_ functions > always with the unwinder? I don't know ... For glibc, most of these functions are included in minimal static executables anyway. At least today, the difference is not going to be large, if it exists at all. In the future, minimal static executables may have a smaller footprint, but even then, these functions are pretty small. The concern is probably more in the opposite direction, that pthread_once pulls in the unwinder …
