https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114664
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
CC'ing some architecture and RA experts for their input.
I believe the riscv64 test showing the same issue would be:
void
bug (void)
{
__asm__ volatile ("" : : : "s0");
}
...but I don't have a cross compiler right now to verify.
Interestingly, I tried what I thought would be the aarch64 test case
(clobbering x29), but it did not ICE. Did I use the wrong hard frame pointer
register or is aarch64 doing something different here?
