https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114676
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Apparently, I decided to go with a MEM_REF already for the load variant of the builtin - vec_xl. I've to check whether there was any reason not to do this also for vec_xst. Making it a pointer which aliases everything might be too big of a hammer I guess?!
