https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #18)
> > --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14)
> >> > --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> >> > BTW, I'm waiting for a review, or at least a nod from a C++ savvy
> >> > person here:
> >> >
> >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/650634.html
> >>
> >> I can give the patch a whirl, thanks.
> >
> > I've attached a rebased patch against current mainline. Let me know if it
> > works on your end, and I'll commit.
>
> I've included both this patch ...
>
> >> I had Andrew's patch in my tree to avoid the issue. Unfortunately,
> >> Solaris/SPARC bootstrap is broken again due to PR ipa/114985.
> >
> > I have provided a patch for that PR as well, but the IPA folk need to say if
> > this is the correct approach.
>
> ... and that one in last night's SPARC bootstraps, which worked just
> fine again. Thanks.
Thanks for testing. I'll close this PR as fixed in mainline then. FWIW, I
also retested on x86-64 Linux.
