https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014
Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think your report was misunderstood. Anyway, when EBP is not a frame pointer,
I think the chances are low that it is derived from ESP. Would accurate
placement of segment override prefixes be worth the effort compared to
prefixing all EBP-relative accesses with DS override?
