https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118455
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to llualpu from comment #2) > Yes, I usually use the simpler -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG and -DDEBUG. But I'll take a > look at -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS because this is the first time I hear about > this. Thanks! -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG can catch the error. -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS enables a subset of checkings of -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG, thus -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS would be redundant.
