https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > Looks related to pr118747, where an elemental subroutine was used > instead of a function. It has some similarities. Since Andre did the fix on that one, we need to see what he thinks on this one.