https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119507
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>
> This has been true since the support for moving comdat gcc_except_table to
> their own section in r0-118218-g3e6011cfebedfb (which was first included in
> GCC 4.8.0).
>
>
> Something like this:
s/||/&&/ :)
Also here is a decent testcase:
```
inline int comdat() { try { throw 1; } catch (int) { return 1; } return 0; }
int another_func_with_exception() { try { throw 1; } catch (int) { return 1; }
return 0; }
inline int comdat1() { try { throw 1; } catch (int) { return 1; } return 0; }
int foo() { return comdat() + comdat1(); }
```
There should be .gcc_except_table._Z6comdatv and .gcc_except_table._Z7comdat1v
created but currently only .gcc_except_table._Z6comdatv and .gcc_except_table
as the exception table for _Z7comdat1v is placed in gcc_except.
