https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Simon Sobisch from comment #4) > @sjames: What do you mean with "needs reduction"? And do you intend to do it > on your own? Yes this is more of a keyword for GCC developers rather than for the user. > > [Note: I've reduced the original program that was generated from as much as > possible, then also reduced the amount of C code passed to GCC] > > In any case: can someone please confirm this issue so we have a reasonable > status (as noted: two people were already able to reproduce it in different > environments using GCC versions 9-12 + 14)? > It also would be interesting to see if trunk still has this issue (I guess > "yes")... I can't speak for Sam here but I suspect until a GCC developer (or bugzilla triager) reproduces it, it will sit in the unconfirmed state. The dependency on a library does make it harder in general.
