https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120805
--- Comment #17 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Avinash Jayakar from comment #16) > Created attachment 61956 [details] > I have just changed the order within the conditional where the const_vf gets > assigned, to have it behave in similar way as before (use of log_vf) That to me is just a plaster rather than a fix. You've flipped the initialization of logvf rather than just adding the explicit requirement that this code can't support epilogues.
