https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So even with hacking the verifiers (for now) and getting this in the
.optimized:
```
void g ()
{
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
f ({}); [tail call]
return;
}
```
We still get a memset and a memcpy. So that is an expand issue.
