https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121520
--- Comment #10 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #9) > All of the changes in > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/4b00a310-89fd-40b2-a7d1- > 93cf55d0a...@redhat.com/ are in the C++ FE and approved by Jason? (Note that https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/aJ7xUYqx30OdC4yJ@tucnak/ remarks that the earlier rs6000 patch was not required.)
