https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122251
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2025-10-13
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This isn't "invariant motion", it would be store motion, but we only apply that
to registers (given usually you have both stores and loads you promote to
registers). When there's no loads and stores only from invariants like here
this might be reasonably easy to integrate. But store sinking would be another
obvious candidate.
