https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122269
--- Comment #5 from Tomasz Kamiński <tkaminsk at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yes, I understand that. My point is that for above example to work, I do not need symbolic addressing. The `e.get<0>()` is prvalue and it's value does not depend on `e` so the references from unknown (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2280r4.html) should be sufficient for it to work.
