https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122226
--- Comment #5 from Matt Godbolt <matt at godbolt dot org> --- Thanks again. Ironically I was trying to demonstrate "cool optimisations" to someone, and gcc let me down here :) The original code was `pair<char,char>` and a string_view; so _Complex is a bit of a stretch, but I can rephrase as two `get min` and `get max` functions if I want to go that way. Thanks again for the replies and your time!
