https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122455
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > The title got me excited that we had another wrong-code testcase for the > devirt changes.. Yes I know which is why I got rid of incorrect. Because statically speculation is never incorrect :).
