https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122455

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> The title got me excited that we had another wrong-code testcase for the
> devirt changes..

Yes I know which is why I got rid of incorrect. Because statically speculation
is never incorrect :).

Reply via email to