https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122555
--- Comment #4 from rudi at heitbaum dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > . > > Note clang does not warn here as it considers (-= 1) as an use even though > it does not considers ++ an use. I wonder if that is why the code uses -= 1 > to get around the warning rather than removing the variable. Looks like the code hasn’t been touched in 7 years. https://github.com/nss-dev/nss/tree/master/cmd/rsaperf I have proposed a patch to drop the variable in the Mozilla bug report.
