https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122126
Avinash Jayakar <avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |avinashd at gcc dot
gnu.org
CC| |avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Avinash Jayakar <avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 62715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62715&action=edit
proposed patch for pr122126 for powerpc64le
In powerpc64le, I see that we generate vsx_set insn during expand pass, without
actually checking for the index operand.
Here is the proposed fix for the powerpc64le backend, if the approach is ok I
can create submit the patch.
Should we do a similar thing for the x86?
