https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121628
--- Comment #27 from Christopher Albert <albert at tugraz dot at> --- (In reply to kargls from comment #26) > On 11/7/25 11:47, albert at tugraz dot at wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121628 > > > > --- Comment #25 from Christopher Albert <albert at tugraz dot at> --- > > Created attachment 62735 [details] > > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62735&action=edit > > Replace C++ by C code > > > > Replaced C++ hash map by a simple C linked list. Tests continue to pass on > > x86_64 Linux. Steve, do you think this is meaningful? > > > > Either is fine with me. The C version with a linked list > is something that I can read and easily understand. The > C++ version simply requires someone else to review. Thank you, in that case, I would appreciate you reviewing the new linked list version. Let's stick to C where C++ offers no clear advantage. PS: To attract young contributors, one should skip over C++ to Rust right away ;) - not sure if this is a good idea
