https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122643
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>Instead, when compiled without optimizations or on other architectures
x86_64 base arch does not include fma which is why you don't see that.
powerpc will see the difference.
Also you can see the difference here:
```
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
[[gnu::noipa]]
double f(double a)
{
return a;
}
int main() {
int n = 41;
double x;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
x = f(1 - (i-1) * (1.0/(n-1)));
}
printf("%f %f\n", x, f(1 - (n-1) * (1.0/(n-1))));
}
```
In the case of using the fma you get -0.0 while without you get 0.0.