https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122717
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Understood. I don't really care about the xstormy port. Mostly want to raise awareness that perhaps the tree-cfgcleanup code had unintended fallout. If there's any reasonable belief it's xstormy backend, then definitely put on the backburner.
