https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122956
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu <liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > On a related subject did spec next fix llvm code up for its undefined code? > > So at least upstream didn't. This would mean spec (again) still depends on > undefined code. Which part is UD?
