https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123107
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> If anything we could reject it after fold in combine_cond_expr_cond.
>
> This is until we remove the call to fold. Which i hope to do for 17.
I am going to do that. I will double check but I think the correct check is
expand_vec_cmp_expr_p . That is for tomorrow (well actually later today :).
