https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123128
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Of course I meant next = NULL; > In any case, this is about > int *p = ((unsigned long int) 0); > and g++ accepts that without warning even for -pedantic-errors -W -Wall, > while > clang++ rejects it even without any options. Interesting outbreak of compile disagreement. This could be a bug report for the language lawyers. See # 123134.
