[Bug target/123216] [16 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2888 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx10.2 -mno-avx512vl and __builtin_ia32_cvttph2ibs128_mask()

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123216

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Given that AVX512VL is among tons of others in
#define OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX10_1_SET \
  (OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512F_SET | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512CD_SET \
   | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512DQ_SET | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512BW_SET \
   | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL_SET | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512IFMA_SET \
   | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VBMI_SET | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VBMI2_SET \
   | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VNNI_SET | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VPOPCNTDQ_SET \
   | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512BITALG_SET)
#define OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX10_1_SET \
  (OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX512FP16_SET | OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX512BF16_SET \
   | OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX10_1)
#define OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX10_2_SET \
  (OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX10_1_SET | OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX10_2)
it makes me wonder if the bug isn't that
OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX512{CD,DQ,BW,VL,IFMA,VBMI,VBMI2,VNNI,VPOPCNTDQ,BITALG}_UNSET
don't include OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX10_1_UNSET.