https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101780
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> The manual does say it doesn't warn about designated initializers, but it
> seems the anonymous union is confusing it.
The docs were fixed with r14-1657-g0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Related to PR 96868.
A dup, I think. I don't think the anonymous union is relevant, C++ warns for
this too:
struct A {
int a = 98, b;
};
int main() {
A polo = {.a = 45};
}
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96868 ***
