https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38612
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
|aliaksandr.yesmanchyk@gmail
| |.com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Aliaksandr Yesmanchyk from comment #10)
> Is it just a lack of reviewers or is there something wrong with a patch?
Lack of reviewer bandwidth is part of the issue here I think. The other part is
GCC was in stage 3 (now stage 4 as of today) which meant bug fixes only. I am
not sure if this counted as a bug fix so I don't know what is in the minds of
the C++ front-end reviewers/maintainers minds here.
The other issue is you sent it a few days before Christmas which is a slow time
for reviewing and folks are out on vacation and such.
> Sorry, this is my first issue, so I don't know how long does it usually take
> to get your patch merged if successful.
It depends. The best thing in this case is to ping the patch again.
See the last section in https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches .
> Also, can anyone assign this bug to me please?
I don't think it matters as it is more of a hint to others that you are working
on it and they should ping you and since you already posted a patch and that is
listed here folks should ping you anyways about it. but I will do that.
